RADIO & TV

Employment Law Update: Right to Request Remote Working

Employment Law Update: Right to Request Remote Working

Back in February, the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment Leo Varadkar  referred the General Scheme of the Right to Request Remote Working Bill to the Joint Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment for pre-legislative scrutiny.  The fruits of the Committee’s labour can be seen in its 54 page Report, published on 7th July which it sets out a series of recommendations it hopes the Government will take on board before the legislation is finally signed into law.  Here Brian Gill, Partner at Callan Tansey Solicitors examines the recommendations made by that committee.

 

Recommendations on the Right to Request Remote Working

 

The Joint Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment recommendations include:

  • Reducing the minimum service period before an employee can make a request to work remotely from 26 weeks to 12 weeks or less
  • Reducing the bureaucracy associated with the drafting of policies related to remote working and providing SMEs with supports in this regard
  • Addressing the anomaly whereby it is not an offence to not have a policy on remote working but it is an offence for an employer not to inform their employees of their policy
  • Enshrining in law the principles underpinning a reasonable Code of Practice for the operation of remote working and allowing the WRC to design how they should be applied in different workplace situations
  • Introducing legislation which would mandate the WRC to draw up a Code of practice upon which the employer’s remote working policies would be based
  • Considering a right of appeal against the employer’s policy in circumstances where there are a high level of refusals of reasonable requests by that employer.
  • Introducing tighter grounds in primary legislation so that unreasonable refusals should be open to challenge
  • Aligning this legislation with the General Scheme of a Work Life Balance and Miscellaneous Provisions Bill 2022
  • Retaining the provision giving the employer 12 weeks to respond to a request for remote worker in circumstances where the employer is developing its remote working policy for the first time.
  • Reducing the amount of time that the employer must respond to the first request.
  • Revisiting the wording of and strengthening objectivity in grounds A, B, C, D, G, H, I, J, K and M, set out below, for declining a request for remote working

 

Most Significant Recommendation on the Right to Remote Working

 

This recommendation , which looks to tighten up the grounds upon which a request can be declined, is arguably the most significant recommendation and the one that is likely to have the most far-reaching impact in practice.

The current grounds are as follows:

 

(a) The nature of the work not allowing for the work to be done remotely

(b) Cannot reorganise work among existing staff

(c) Potential Negative impact on quality of business product or service

(d) Potential Negative impact on performance of employee or other employees

(e) Burden of Additional Costs, taking into account the financial and other costs entailed and the scale and financial resources of the employer’s business

(f) Concerns for the protection of business confidentiality or intellectual property

(g) Concerns for the suitability of the proposed workspace on health and safety grounds

(h) Concerns for the suitability of the proposed workspace on data protection grounds

(i) Concerns for the internet connectivity of the proposed remote working location.

(j) Concerns for the commute between the proposed remote working location and employer’s on-site location

(k) The proposed remote working arrangement conflicts with the provisions of an applicable collective agreement

(l)  Planned structural changes would render any of (a) to (k) applicable

(m) Employee is the subject of ongoing or recently concluded formal disciplinary process

 

In its Report the Committee members acknowledged that much of the commentary surrounding the Bill had not been positive. Much of this negative commentary surrounded the aforesaid grounds of refusal which the Committee believes were “cumbersome” and “require change”. As things stand, the concern is that employers will all too easily find a way of being able to rely on one of the above grounds employee representative groups will want to see that balance recalibrated before the Bill becomes law. The Government’s final position is eagerly awaited.

 

Brian Gill, Partner, is Head of Commercial Litigation and Employment Law at Callan Tansey Solicitors.  If you have any questions about the Right to Remote working and how it may impact you or your business you can contact Brian at BGill@callantansey.ie

Sepsis: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment

Sepsis: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment

The World Health Organisations first Global Report on sepsis found that death from sepsis accounts for 20% of all deaths worldwide. Sepsis kills 11 million people each year. Here Johan Verbruggen outlines the symptoms, causes and treatment of sepsis and how we support patients and families who have suffered from sepsis infection.

What is Sepsis?

 

Sepsis is a systemic (whole-body) response to infection. The term derives from the Greek sėpsis, ‘putrefaction’ – decay or rotting.

Sepsis is defined by the Department of Health’s National Clinical Guideline on Management of Sepsis for Adults as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection.

 

Is Sepsis the same as Septicemia?

 

Sepsis is one stage in septicaemia. Septicaemia is the term for the physiological process. It can range from mild where the patient appears well at first, to overwhelming and life-threatening illness. Clinically, there are six distinct and progressively worsening stages of septicaemia:

  • Infection
  • Bacteraemia
  • Sepsis
  • Severe sepsis
  • Septic shock
  • Multiple organ failure/dysfunction

 

What are the Signs and Symptoms of Sepsis?

 

A patient can appear clinically well in the early stages of sepsis. As sepsis progresses, a patient can exhibit symptoms such as hyperventilating, a fast heart rate, a high temperature, sweating and shaking (known as ‘rigors’).

Evolving sepsis is monitored by easily-measured changes in the body’s vital signs:

  • Respiratory rate
  • Oxygen saturation
  • Body temperature
  • Pulse
  • Blood pressure
  • Pain

What causes Sepsis?

 

Sepsis caused by an infection. Identifying the source of infection and where in the anatomy it is found to have originated can help the clinician in determining the type of bacterium or fungus responsible. For example:

  • Sepsis involving the respiratory tract is often caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae;
  • Sepsis involving the gall bladder or the bowel is often caused by Enterococcus faecalis, or by coli;
  • Sepsis involving the urinary tract is often caused by Escherichia coli;
  • Sepsis involving the pelvic organs is often caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
  • Sepsis involving the skin is often caused by Staphylococcus aureus;

Research has shown that in upwards of 30% of cases of patients hospitalised with sepsis, a definite microbiological source is not found.

 

What is Septic Shock?

 

Septic shock is defined in the Department of Health’s National Clinical Guideline on Sepsis Management for Adults as a subset of sepsis in which underlying circulatory and cellular/metabolic abnormalities are profound enough to substantially increase mortality.

In septic shock the patient is profoundly unwell; he or she has severe sepsis, together with frank organ failure and low blood pressure (hypotension). Septic shock is an emergency and it can progress rapidly to multiorgan failure, and death.

 

What is the Treatment for Sepsis Infection?

 

It is well established that early recognition and treatment of sepsis is crucial to halt its development. This involves:

 

  • Early identification of sepsis through careful monitoring of the patient’s vital signs, while searching for the likely source of infection
  • Timely treatment with an appropriate antibiotic or anti-fungal
  • Timely fluid resuscitation in severely ill patients

 

Supporting Patients and Families Following Sepsis Infection

 

We have successfully represented patients who have suffered long-term physical disability as a result of delayed diagnosis and treatment of sepsis due to medical negligence. Unfortunately, we have represented families at court and at inquests, whose loved ones have died because sepsis was not detected and treated in time.

We act for patients where there is a delay in treating meningitis, infections and viral conditions.

 

What Are The Time Limits For Making A Sepsis Medical Negligence Claim?

 

You have two years from the date of you contracting sepsis, or the date that you discovered that the sepsis was caused or not treated properly, because of medical negligence, to start court proceedings, with some exceptions:

  • Where a child has been injured as a result of negligence, court proceedings can be commenced any time before their 20th birthday.
  • There are no time limits to make a claim on behalf of someone who lacks the mental capacity to take their own case.

While it may be the case that you have months or even years to commence court proceedings, it is strongly advised that you engage a solicitor to investigate injuries possibly caused surgical negligence as soon as possible. This will enable us to gather medical evidence such as hospital records and expert reports in support of your claim.

 

Why Choose Callan Tansey Solicitors LLP?

 

Callan Tansey Solicitors LLP was judged the best medical negligence law firm in the Ireland in 2021, winning the Irish Law Awards Medical Negligence Firm of the Year.  With six offices across Ireland we are the best medical negligence lawyers near you.

We have 25 years of experience wining medical cases and successfully helping injured patients. We fight hard to get you clear answers as to whether or not you have been injured by medical negligence.  We have acted in the highest courts across the country, we have built a team of compassionate, knowledgeable and fearless Solicitors. Taking a case can be intimidating and overwhelming. We will support and guide you every step of the way to get you answers and justice.

 

*In contentious business, a solicitor may not calculate fees or other charges as a percentage or proportion of any award or settlement.

 

The above information is not healthcare advice. The information provided is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment provided by your own medical doctor. Always seek the advice of a doctor or medical professional if you have concerns about your health.

5 Key amendments in the The Personal Injuries Resolution Board Bill 2022

5 Key amendments in the The Personal Injuries Resolution Board Bill 2022

The Minister of State for Trade Promotion, Digital and Company Regulation published The Personal Injuries Resolution Board Bill 2022 on 2nd August 2022.The aim of the Bill is to further reform how personal injuries claims are dealt with in Ireland. Caroline McLaughlin, Partner in Callan Tansey Personal Injuries Litigation Department outlines 5 key amendments in the new bill and the impact they will have on Personal Injuries claims.

Currently personal injuries claims are dealt with by the Personal Injuries Assessment (PIAB). The Personal Injuries Resolution Board Bill 2022 seeks to further extend the functions of PIAB. The new Bill provides for the renaming of the Personal Injuries Assessment Board as the Personal Injuries Resolution Board (PIRB)

The new Bill includes the following amendments to the Personal Injuries Assessment Board Act 2003-2019 to ensure that the:

 

1. Mediation will be offered as a means of resolving a claim

 

This will apply if the parties consent to mediation of the claim. Participation in the mediation is voluntary and a party may withdraw from the mediation at any time prior to the date of completion of the mediation. It remains to be seen how both claimants and respondents embrace this new provision.

 

2. Personal Injuries Resolution Board will retain claims of a wholly psychological nature.

 

At present PIAB have a discretion as to whether to assess claims of a psychological nature. As the new Personal Injuries Guidelines now provide for psychological injury this will result in the claims now being dealt with by the PIRB.

 

3. PIRB will have additional time to assess claims

 

This will apply where an injury is yet to settle rather than releasing to litigation. This will potentially extend the period for assessment by PIRB by an additional period of 2 years.

 

4. PIRB will take measures to reduce fraud.

 

Where a claimant does not have a PPS number, PIRB will seek proof of identity on application. This information will then be disclose to An Garda Síochána to help reduce fraud.

 

5. PIRB will deepen its analysis and public information roles

 

The Bill also proposes to amend s54 of the Act to provide that the PIRB:

  • collect and publish on its website information in relation to personal injuries claims,
  • conduct or commission research studies and analysis on matters relating to functions of the Board
  • collect and compile such information and publish any findings it considers appropriate.
  • Promote public awareness and conduct public information campaigns in relation to the work of the Board

The Bill also provides that an a person who knowingly or recklessly provides the Board with information which is false or misleading shall be guilty of an offence.

The Minister is also proposing to amend section 51A of the Act to encourage early resolution of claims and minimise legal costs. In practice this proposal will mean if enacted the PIAB assessment will have the same effect as an offer of tender and will be subject to the existing Court rules in relation to same. This means that if a claimant rejects a PIRB assessment and does not achieve a higher award they will be liable for their own costs and the Defendants costs from the date of Tender. Legal advice should always be obtained before making any decisions regarding Assessments.

Further updates will be provided on the progression of the Bill over the coming months.

It remains to be seen what the full impact of the Bill will be. It is hoped as with all reform in this area that the voice of the injured party is taken into consideration. At the core of these cases is an injured person who would prefer not to find themselves facing the gauntlet of having to seek compensation in a system becoming increasingly complicated. Their voice should be at the heart of the debate.

Caroline McLaughlin, Partner in Callan Tansey Personal Injuries Litigation Department, specialises in Personal Injury Litigation including Road Traffic Accidents, Catastrophic Injury, Fatal Injury actions, Accidents at work and public liability claims dealing with applications to the Injuries Board ‘PIAB’, applications to the Motor Insurers Bureau of Ireland ‘MIBI’ and manages a personal injury caseload at District Court, Circuit Court and High Court level

If you have questions about any of the issues raised in this article you can contact Caroline McLaughlin at our Sligo offce here.

Woman who had cyst on her brain receives €3 Million Settlement

Woman who had cyst on her brain receives €3 Million Settlement

Our Roger Murray SC represents a woman who, through her sister, sued the HSE claiming a cyst on her brain was not diagnosed for over two years. Her High Court action was settled with an interim payment of €3 million. The 30 year old woman, who cannot be identified by order of the court, needs 24-hour care for the rest of her life.

 

Failure to diagnose

The Court heard that the women had first attended Mayo General Hospital in 2014 after she suffered a grand mal seizure.  A CT scan of her brain carried out on December 26th 2014 was reported back as normal.  However it was claimed that this was not the case, and in fact the scan was grossly abnormal and there was a failure to diagnose a benign colloid cyst on her brain.

 

Irreparable brain damage

It was further claimed an alleged failure to refer the young woman for a neurological examination in December 2014, and that at CT scan arranged for March 2016 had been cancelled. When the cyst was eventually diagnosed the woman underwent a life-saving operation.  However she was left with irreparable front lobe damage.

 

Impact of delayed diagnosis

A benign colloid cyst can lead to a build-up of intercranial pressure and tissue damage. It was claimed that if the cyst on her brain had been identified and treated prior to July 2017 the young woman would not have suffered rising intracranial pressure and consequent cell death between 2014 and 2017.  Furthermore she would not have suffered the acute collapse and damage during 2017.

 

Court settlement

The court heard that the woman now needs “a guardian angel with her 25 hours a day”, as she requires round the clock care.  The interim payment of €3 million is for the next seven years, at that point her future care needs will be assessed.

 

Solicitor remarks on interim awards

Speaking after the settlement, Roger Murray SC said, “this settlement highlights the flexibility of interim awards. It means that the family no longer have to worry about care or supervision costs-they will be covered in full for the next 7 years. A court will then determine how care should be costed after that. The family can elect for a further interim award, a final lump sum or regular periodic payment for life”.

MEDIA REPORTS

Kildare Nationalist

Echo Live

BreakingNews.i

What Happens At An Inquest?

What Happens At An Inquest?

An inquest is an official enquiry, held in public and led by a Coroner (sometimes held with a jury)  to enquire into the cause of a sudden, unexplained or violent death.   In the case of some deaths an inquest is legally required.  In other cases an inquest is held at the discretion of the Coroner.  Here Roger Murray, Partner at CallanTansey Solicitors outlines some of the most common queries regarding inquests.

What is the Purpose of an Inquest?

  1. To establish the identity of the person who has died;
  2. To establish how, when and where the death occurred; and
  3. To investigate the circumstances in which the death occurred and
  4. To make findings and return a verdict.

 What is the role of a Coroner?

The Coroner examines the circumstances surrounding a death, investigates the medical cause of death and also the wider surrounding circumstances leading to the death.

What does a Coroner Do?

The Coroner’s job is to investigate all deaths reported to him or her.  If the death is natural, and a Medical Certificate can be procured so certifying, that is the end of the investigation.  Where the death is unnatural or where there is some doubt about the circumstances leading to the death, the Coroner will direct that a post-mortem takes place.  After the post-mortem report is available to the Coroner, he/she will then decide if a full Court Inquest is required.  A Coroner must hold an Inquest in relation to the death of any individual in State custody, (regardless of the circumstances) and it is also now mandatory for the Coroner to hold an Inquest where the death is a maternal death or late maternal death (within 12 months after birth taking place).  In all other circumstances, the holding of an Inquest is at the discretion of the Coroner.

Who reports the death to the Coroner?

Persons obliged to report death to the Coroner include the following:

  1. Any Medical Practitioner, Nurse or Midwife who had responsibility for, or involvement in, the treatment or care of the person who has died in the period immediately before his/her death or who was present at his/her death.
  2. Any Medical Practitioner who examines the body of a Deceased after death.
  3. Any Paramedic or Advanced Paramedic who had responsibility for, or was involved in, the care of the Deceased in the period immediately before his/her death or who was present after his death.
  4. The Funeral Undertaker responsible for the disposal of the body of the Deceased person.
  5. The person in charge of a mortuary.
  6. The occupier of a house or other dwelling including a mobile dwelling in which Deceased person was residing at the time of the death
  7. The person in charge of any public or private institution or premises in which the Deceased was residing or receiving treatment.
  8. A person who had care of the Deceased immediately prior or before his/her death
  9. Where the Deceased person was in State custody or detention the person who has responsibility for the Deceased person
  10. The person in charge of an aircraft, ship or other vessel landing or arriving in the State on which the Deceased person was travelling at the time of his/her death.
  11. The Registrar of Deaths in the District.

Unless that person has reasonable grounds for believing that the death has already been reported to the Coroner by another person specified in the list above.

In the context of a stillborn child or a death during birth any medical practitioner, nurse or midwife who had responsibility for, or involvement in, the treatment or care of the woman concerned in the period immediately before or after the delivery of the stillborn child or was present at the delivery is required to report the death of the baby.

The obligation to report is discharged if the person reports the death as soon as practicable after becoming aware of it to a member of An Garda Siochana.

What Categories of Deaths Must be Reported to a Coroner?

  1. Maternal Deaths and Late Maternal Deaths
  2. The death of a stillborn child or of a child during its first year of life.
  3. Any death which occurred or may have occurred either directly or indirectly:
    1. In a violent or unnatural manner or by unfair means;
    2. By misadventure or accident;
    3. Unexpectedly and for unknown causes or in an unexplained manner;
    4. As a result of negligence, misconduct or malpractice on the part of others, or
    5. In such circumstances as may, in the public interest, require investigation.
  4. Death by suicide or by assisted suicide
  5. Death by notifiable disease
  6. Death by drug reactions or overdose
  7. Death by prion disease
  8. Deaths that may be healthcare acquired infection
  9. Any death occurring in a hospital or other health institution
    1. That is unexpected
    2. Within 24 hours of presentation or admission whichever is the later
    3. Of a person transferred from a nursing home
  10. Any child who dies during birth.
  11. Any death occurring in a hospital or other health institution that is directly or indirectly related to a surgical operation or anaesthesia (including recovery from the effects of anaesthesia) or to any other medical, surgical or dental procedure, regardless of the length of time between the procedure and death
  12. Any death where an allegation is made, or a concern has been expressed regarding the medical treatment provide to the Deceased person or the management of his or her healthcare.
  13. Any death which may be as a result of an unconventional medical procedure or treatment

What is a Coroners Court?

The Coroner’s Court occupies a “unique” position in Irish law.  It has many powers and functions which point to the administration of justice such as: the power to summon witnesses under Section 26 and to compel their attendance under Sections 36 and 37.  A person may be found guilty (section 38) of contempt at an Inquest and be brought before the Court.  A new Act (The Coroner’s (Amendment) Act 2019) came into force in February, 2020 which has given Coroners much greater powers and will help families get answers.

The Coroner’s Court has now the capacity (albeit with the assistance of other Courts) to penalise reluctant witnesses, people who deliberately mislead the Court, and/or those who obstruct the Court in its investigative powers.  Its investigative powers have been significantly strengthened.  Now it has the power to seek discovery of records and obtain search warrants to search buildings and seize documents and equipment.

Section 16 also proposes to amend Section 31 of the 1962 Act.  This gives investigative powers to the Coroner’s Court in relation to determining how a death occurred.  For example, if the HSA has concluded that a company is guilty of corporate manslaughter, the Coroner now has the power to investigate any individual who is responsible and to determine if  such individual is “liable to be proceeded against and punished” and pass that finding to another Court.  The view that the Coroner’s Court is becoming a significant player in the Irish judicial landscape is strengthened by the extension of the Legal Aid Scheme to family members at Inquests.

What are the steps a Coroner takes once notified of a death?

Once notified of a death, the Coroner will ask the investigating member of the Gardai for all details relating to the Deceased including all of their personal details and full and detailed circumstances surrounding the death including the name of the registered medical practitioner who pronounced death and the name of any medical practitioner who may be in a position to offer a Medical Certificate of the cause of death.  In the vast majority of cases, deaths are usually reported by a Doctor directly to the Coroner or the local Garda Station.  Following receipt of the details, the Coroner will make enquiries in relation to the circumstances of the death.  Even if the death was sudden, if it is due to natural causes, the Coroner will contact a registered medical practitioner and ask him or her to issue a Medical Certificate of the cause of death.  This will only happen where it appears to the Coroner that the death is not due to any unnatural cause.  The registered medical practitioner must have seen and treated the patient within one month prior to the death and there should be no other circumstances which might require an Inquest to be held.  If allegations of one kind or another are in existence or there is some concern, the Coroner will not permit the doctor to issue a Medical Certificate and will proceed to direct a post-mortem examination.  It must be emphasised that the Coroner has legal possession of the body and has a statutory duty to enquire fully into all of the circumstances of certain deaths.  If the medical doctor is in a position to satisfy the Coroner, with regard to the cause of death, and no other matters arise or give the Coroner cause for concern, the Coroner will normally direct the medical practitioner to issue a Certificate and the death will be registered without an Inquest.  The fact that a death is reported to a Coroner for discussion does not necessarily mean that an autopsy will automatically be required.  However, once the Coroner is in possession of all of the relevant facts and has had a full discussion, the Coroner can make an informed decision as to whether or not it would be prudent in the circumstances to direct a post-mortem examination.  If there is any doubt in the matter, the better course of action is for the Coroner to so direct.  Where the post-mortem examination confirms or establishes an unnatural cause of death or where the circumstances surrounding the death give rise to concern, an Inquest must be held.  While awaiting a post-mortem report or prior to the Inquest being held, the Coroner’s Office may provide, on request, an Interim Certificate of the Fact of Death, which is acceptable to banks, insurance companies and other institutions to confirm that the death has occurred albeit that the circumstances have yet to be established.

What powers does a Coroner have?

  • To direct a Post-Mortem examination of a Deceased person;
  • To direct the holding of an Inquest;
  • To direct that all relevant medical records be given to the registered medical practitioner conducting the post-mortem examination and to the Coroner;
  • To get a High Court Order to direct that a person giving evidence comply with a direction given by the Coroner

Who acts as a Coroner?

  1. Any registered medical practitioner or legal practitioner of at least 5 years standing.
  2. A Coroner is allowed to hold office to the age of 70.
  3. They must be appointed by the Local Authority for every district in whose area the district is situated.
  4. Most Districts have Part-Time Coroners and Deputy Coroners, with the exception of Cork (full time Coroner) and Dublin City: full-time Coroner in addition to having an Assistant Coroner and two Deputy Coroners.
  5. In all other cases, the people holding the position of Coroner have “day jobs” as practising lawyers or doctors.  Their position is as Coroner is part-time.

Does the Coroner have to keep the family of the deceased notified about Inquests and their findings?

Where a Coroner has directed a post-mortem examination, as far as practicable, he/she shall ensure that a family member of the Deceased person is informed of the fact and is informed that material may be removed from the body and retained for the purpose of a post-mortem examination.  A copy of the post mortem report may be furnished to members of the Deceased persons family if they so request.  There is no mandatory requirement to provide family members with the report.  The Coroner shall, if so directed by a family member provide a copy of the report to that family member but the Coroner does have a discretion not to furnish the report under the new Section 33 (E) 5 if the Coroner thinks that it is not proper to do so as it may prejudice criminal proceedings as are being considered or have been instituted.

How soon after death is reported is an Inquest arranged?

A death which is reportable to the Coroner as defined in the legislation must be reported “as soon as practicable”.  The Coroner will then see if a post-mortem is required and if a post-mortem is required, the results will generally be available within 6-10 weeks.  If the Coroner is then of the view that an Inquest is required, an Inquest will take place as soon as the opportunity to set a date for hearing for the Inquest.  This will depend on a number of factors including the number of witnesses, the complexity of the facts, whether documents are involved and whether witnesses are available.  For complicated Inquests, it is not unusual for them to take place a year or more following the death of a Deceased.  Inquests can generally be concluded within one day, but certain complex medical Inquests can go on for several days.

Who can go to an Inquest?

Inquests are heard in public and any member of the public can attend any Inquest.  Only properly “interested persons” may ask questions.  This would include family members of the Deceased or anyone involved in their death.  They are entitled to ask questions themselves, or appoint lawyers to represent them.  The proceedings at an Inquest are inquisitorial in nature:  it involves working together to try to help the Coroners Court gather evidence.

Are there different types of Inquest?

Inquests are essentially an Inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of the Deceased.  Some Inquests will, of course, be more lengthy and complicated than others.  If the immediate cause of death is clear and if there are no significant or lengthy background facts, then the Inquest can generally be determined in a number of hours.  If the case involves for instance complex medical treatment taking place over several days or weeks and involves many witnesses and medical records, then the Inquest may hear from many witnesses and may take place over several days.

What should you wear to an Inquest?

Because an Inquest is a formal event and takes place in a Court, formal/business wear is the norm.

What happens if I am called to be Witness at an Inquest?

If you are called to be a witness, you will first be contacted by the Gardai and you will be asked to provide a deposition.  That deposition can either be prepared in writing by you or with the assistance of the Gardai.  The written deposition is then submitted to the Coroners Court.  When the Inquest begins sitting you must then physically come to Court and read that deposition out.  Once the deposition has been read out and signed by the person giving evidence, then it becomes evidence.  When you are in the Coroners Court, and you are called to physically give evidence. You will have to speak in public under oath in the witness box.  You are liable to be asked questions by both the Coroner and any legal representatives present for any of the interested parties.

 Do you have to attend an Inquest if called as a Witness?

It is an offence to not answer a Summons to appear as a witness at an inquest where “no reasonable excuse exists”.  The Coroner has a new power to go to the High Court in respect of any person who has been served with a Summons and fails without reasonable  excuse to attend.The High Court can then:

  1.  Order the person to comply with the Summons
  2. Make such other or other Order as is necessary to enable the Order to be made
  3. Make an Order for costs.

What kind of evidence might the Coroner expect from a witness?

The Coroner will expect a witness to read out his/her deposition and answer questions.  They Coroner may also:

  1. Direct a witness to answer questions, even if the witness refuses
  2. Direct the production of, by any person, any document, article, substance, or thing in its possession or control

In this regard “document” includes the following:

  1. A book, record or other written or printed material
  2. A photograph
  3. Any information stored, maintained or preserved by means of any mechanical or electronical device whether stored, maintained or preserved in legible form
  4. Any audio or video recording.

What happens if a Witness is not in the State at the time of the Inquest?

Where a Coroner is satisfied that a person is likely to be absent from the State during the time of an Inquest, the Coroner may direct that the evidence of that witness be taken or the production by them of any document or article at any time before the commencement of the Inquest.

Can I ask questions at an Inquest?

You can ask questions at an Inquest only if you are “an interested party” or are the representative of an interested party e.g. a family member.  Remember, this is a Court, and the strict formal rules of evidence apply.  You will be facing qualified lawyers and the Coroner who is trained in the law of evidence.  It is much better to be legally represented.

What questions can I ask at an Inquest?

 If you are an interested party, either you or a lawyer on your behalf can ask questions to assist the Coroner in establishing the circumstances surrounding a death.  A witness is not obliged to answer a question which will result in criminal or civil liability.  Questions such as “Was this negligent?” or “Was this criminal?” will not be allowed.  The purpose of an Inquest is not to establish guilt or innocence; it is to assist the Coroner in establishing all of the facts which lead up to the death of the Deceased and to try to prevent something like that happening again.

 What powers does a Coroner have to gather evidence?

A Coroner has the power to apply to the District Court for a warrant to enter a premises, if necessary by the use of reasonable force, to inspect, copy or take extracts from or, if necessary seize, documents the Court requires or to inspect or to if necessary to seize the articles, substances or things concerned in those premises.

If a Coroner considers that he or she requires the advice or assistance of an expert in respect of a matter for the purposes of his or her inquiry into a death, he or she may seek and obtain such advice or assistance from a person who has expertise in respect of that matter.   This is a significant power and recognises that some Coroners have appointed their own experts to review certain matters, including, in particular, independent Pathologists.

A Coroner can direct a second post-mortem examination be carried out “for the purpose of enquiring into the death of a person”.

What is a Coroners Report?

The Coroner will have a post-mortem report which will assist him/ her in coming to a decision about the cause of death.  At the end of a Court hearing of all of the evidence at an Inquest the Coroner (or the jury) will record a verdict.  This will relate to the identity of the Deceased person and how, where and when the death occurred.  The “how” includes not only the medical cause of death but all the circumstances leading to the death.  It will generally be a short neutral summary of the facts followed by a formal legal conclusion or verdict such as “Death by Misadventure”, “Death by Accident”.  In most instances involving medical care, there will be a “Narrative Verdict” which is effectively a short summary of all of the evidence encapsulating everything that was discussed.  Recommendations can also be attached to the Inquest verdict which are recommendations of a general character designed to prevent further fatalities or are considered necessary or desirable in the interests of public health and safety.

Who can get a copy of a Coroners Report?

The post-mortem report is a private part of the Coroner’s file.  Only family members or their lawyers can access it.  The record of verdict can be applied for by the next of kin of the Deceased or their legal representatives but it is  a document of public record and is available to anybody who makes the appropriate application to the Coroners Office.

HSE Apologises to parents after death of newborn baby

HSE Apologises to parents after death of newborn baby

Almost five years after the death of newborn baby Danny Ryan, the HSE has apologised to his parents, Brenda and Michael.  An inquest  in June 2019 heard the cause of Danny’s death was severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen.  The case, which was before the Court for ruling on the statutory award for mental distress arising from a wrongful death, was settled for an undisclosed sum.

 

Delivery delayed despite gestational diabetes

 

The High Court heard that Danny’s mother, Brenda Ryan, had gestational diabetes while pregnant.  She should have been delivered at 40 weeks gestation, but instead the pregnancy was allowed to continue until 40 weeks and ten days. Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital in Drogheda apologised for the “deficits in care” which had been highlighted in a review.

 

“We want to see evidence of change”

 

Danny’s parents Brenda and Michael Ryan, who were represented by Roger Murray S.C., gave a statement outside the High Court following the case. In it they said too many people had stood in court before them with the same experience and devastating loss. “If we had any advice for parents, it is to trust your gut at all times, “ they said. They acknowledged that so many parents were advocating for better maternity care, adding “we challenge the HSE again today. We want to see evidence of change. No parent should have to make the decision to turn of their new-born baby’s life support.”

 

The need for open disclosure

 

“The HSE needs to start with open disclosure. Even though Danny was born over four years ago, it was only on the 1st of October 2021 that the SHE admitted liability for the multiple avoidable failures during my pregnancy and Dannys birth. The apology letter made no mention of striving for better maternity care. It made no mention of the coroner’s recommendation from 2020 and it made no mention of policy reform.”

 

“It took us nearly five years to get justice”

 

“Add to this the whole legal review process to get justice for a poor helpless baby is heartbreakingly long and painful. No parents should have to be mentally assessed multiple times, attend so many review meetings and read heart breaking reports.

“It took us nearly five years to get justice. Parents can’t fight the HSE alone and it is only with the support of our family and friends that we have made it to today.”

 

“Our hearts will remain broken”

 

“We don’t ever forget that our baby son Danny is at the centre of today. We are stronger people for having met him, for having held him and we all continue to love Danny as a much wanted first baby of the family,” the Ryans said.

“Danny continues to drive us forward every day and we hope that he will help other babies too, because he became an organ donor when he donated his tiny heart valves.

“Our hearts will remain broken, although our smiles remain for you Danny and your beautiful little brothers. Thank you for choosing us Danny Ryan, we will be forever and always in love with you.”

 

Solicitor calls for implementation of coroners recommendations to be mandatory

 

When delivering a narrative verdict at the inquest in 2019, Coroner Myra Cullinane endorsed new RCSI guidelines, introduced in 2018, which reduce the length of time a woman with gestational diabetes can go over term. The family’s solicitor, Roger Murray SC said the implementation of the coroners recommendations should be mandatory, as happens in other jurisdictions.

 

MEDIA REPORTS

WATCH Virgin Media News    from 1:13 minutes

The Irish Times

Newstalk 

Irish Examiner

RTE

Irish Independent

Irish Mirror

Breaking News

LMFM

iradio

 

 

Why Listening To New Mothers Birth Experience Is So Important

Why Listening To New Mothers Birth Experience Is So Important

Niamh Ní Mhurchú is Joint Managing Partner at Callan Tansey Solicitors, an experienced Medical Neglignece specialist and a mother of four children.  Here she discusses the importance of listening to new mothers, hearing about their birth experience, and learning from their stories to help improve outcomes.

In my work as a Medical Negligence solicitor I meet many mothers who come to me seeking answers to their questions about the labour and delivery of their babies.  For some there is a niggling feeling that something is not quite right.  For others, they need a greater understanding of events that occurred around the birth, why certain decisions were taken and the implications of those decisions on their life.

Many of the women I meet feel they have not had the opportunity to raise these concerns while in the hospital.  In other cases it is only with the passage of time, and discussing their experience with family and friends that they realise they have unresolved issues.  It can be difficult to get access to their birth notes, to speak with the team who attended at the birth and to get answers to questions about what happened and why.

For this reason it is wonderful to see Sligo University Hospital Maternity Department hosting a patient engagement forum.  The hospital is inviting women who recently attended its Maternity Department, or who are currently accessing maternity services to meet with them at The Glasshouse Hotel, on Tuesday July 19th from 12pm to 2pm. The goal of the forum is for hospital staff to meet with women, listen to their birth experiences and learn from those experiences.

This initiataive follows the  Birth Reflections service launched at the Rotunda Hospital last year.  This midwife led service offers patients of The Rotunda a one-to-one appointment to listen to any concerns, reflect on the birth experience and talk it through with a dedicated midwife.

This service, and forums like that being hosted by Sligo University Hospital are initiatives I would love to see rolled out across all of our Maternity units.

Giving birth is a life-changing event, and new motherhood can be exhausting and at times overwhelming.  Women can feel their concerns are not heard and often experience an inability to advocate for themselves and their babies.  As a mother of four children, I understand that each birth experience is different.  Over the years I have heard stories of women whose lives have been completely altered by experiences of birth.

These include 3rd and 4th degree tears, bladder, uterine and bowel prolapse. These injuries can have a significant impact on their day-to-day lives and their ability to care for their babies often as first time mothers. These injuries are more likely to occur during the first vaginal birth.

New mothers often suffer in silence due to the social stigma surrounding their symptoms which are often hidden in society. Urinary incontinence, anal incontinence, the inability to control flatulence are deeply distressing symptoms, so many young women find themselves isolated (long before the COVID Pandemic) for fear of social stigma. Women have also confided that they are no longer able to tolerate intercourse as they have been left with significant pain and fear of making matters worse. As it’s not spoken about, these young women are completely unaware of how common these symptoms are and I have no doubt it can lead to social isolation, anxiety and depression.

For many, the opportunity to have their concerns addressed, to be listened to and understood would have been invaluable. For others an early intervention to address traumas, injuries and life-impacting outcomes would have been transformative.  It is vital that we give women the opportunity to voice their concerns around their child-birth experience.  To ensure that they are listened to, heard and fully supported. To recognise the areas of our maternity services that are serving mothers and their babies well and to highlight the areas where there is room to improve.

If you have questions on any of the issues raised in this article, please contact Niamh Ni Mhurchu, Joint Managing Partner, Callan Tansey Solicitors LLP nnm@callantansey.ie.

Inquest Into Woman’s Death Due To Penicillin Allergy

Inquest Into Woman’s Death Due To Penicillin Allergy

An inquest was held into the death of Mrs. Patricia Bewick at Tralee Circuit Court on July 14th 2022. Mrs. Bewick, from Tarbert, Co. Kerry  was a much loved mother and grandmother who had a penicillin allergy. She died in University Hospital Kerry on the July 17th 2019, shortly after taking penicillin prescribed at her GP practice.

Felt Unwell After Taking Prescribed Penicillin

 

Mrs. Bewick’s daughter, Anne White, gave evidence of returning home from work around 22.50pm on July 15th.  She found her mother feeling unwell, reporting that she had begun to feel unwell shortly after taking her prescribed tablet at 6pm. Her mother’s condition deteriorated, she was experiencing pins and needles in her fingers, her lips were tingling and she was finding it hard to breath, a short time later she became unable to speak.

EPI Pen Administered

 

Anne called the ambulance and shortly afterwards her mother experienced a fit and collapsed. When the ambulance crew arrived Anne explained her mother’s symptoms, showed them the tablets she had taken and told them that her mother was allergic to penicillin. At this point the paramedic administered an epi pen.  They worked on Mrs. Bewick for some time before taking her to Kerry University Hospital where she subsequently died in ICU.

Allergic Reaction To Penicillin

 

Mrs. Bewick suffered from COPD and Pathologist Nollaig Parfrey, Emeritus Professor of Pathology at University College Cork gave evidence that she had an allergic reaction due to her allergy to penicillin, with emphysema being a contributing factor.

Penicillin Allergy Not Flagged in GP File System

 

Mrs. Bewick was a patient of the Tarbert Medical Centre. Dr. Rosalie Ashley, who worked there on a part-time basis gave evidence of seeing Mrs. Bewick a number of times, but never had the penicillin allergy been mentioned.  She also said that the allergy was not flagged in the allergies section of the computerised file system at the GP practice. She also said that she routinely asked patients if they had any allergies

Hospital Letters Had Highlighted Penicillin Allergy

 

Dr. Dominic Lehane, who runs the Tarbert Medical Centre and had also treated Mrs. Bewick gave evidence that he was not aware that she was allergic to penicillin. When cross-examined by Alistair Rutherdale BL he accepted that there had in fact been about five letters to the medical practice from various hospitals which had clearly highlighted Mrs. Bewicks penicillin allergy.

Verdict of Death Due to Anaphylatic Shock due to Penicillin Allergy

 

Coroner Helen Lucey returned a narrative verdict, death due to anaphylactic shock due to an allergy to penicillin, following the ingestion of penicillin which had been prescribed.

Family Statement

 

Speaking on behalf of the family, Niamh Ni Mhurchú, Joint Managing Partner at Callan Tansey Solicitors said:

 

“The family of Patricia Bewick are devastated at the loss of their much-loved mother and adored grandmother. Mrs. Bewick died of anaphylactic shock after taking penicillin which was prescribed by her GP practice. The fact she was allergic to penicillin had previously been communicated to her GP practice. The simple act of placing a warning on the front of her medical file at her GP’s office, noting her allergy to penicillin would have prevented her death.

 

It is vital that accurate recording of drug allergy status is clearly and prominently documented on all patient records to prevent this happening again. We call on all GP practices to ensure audits are carried out on every one of their patient files to ensure that where required these warnings are clearly flagged.  This will prevent the prescription and administration of drugs inducing allergic reactions and will improve patient safety.

 

No other family should have to endure the heartache this family have suffered over the past three years.”

 

MEDIA REPORTS

READ: Radio Kerry News

LISTEN: KerryToday

Medical Negligence Case From 46 Years Ago Settled

Medical Negligence Case From 46 Years Ago Settled

The High Court has approved a settlement of €850,000 against the HSE over the circumstances of the birth, 46 years ago, of a woman with Cerebral Palsy. Paula Corcoran from Sligo was born in Galway Regional Hospital in 1976. It is believed to be the first medical negligence case to deal with events from more than 40 years ago.

Proceedings were initially brought in the case in 2014. Ms. Corcoran had sued the HSE through her late father Malachy Corcoran over the circumstances of her birth. It was claimed that her mother, Emily, was admitted to the hospital on April 7, 1976, and informed that her baby was in an abnormal position.

During the night Mrs. Corcoran went into labour and Paula was delivered by emergency caesarean section, but she required resuscitation. It was claimed that there was a failure to carefully assess the situation when labour started. It was also alleged that there was a failure to adopt a clear plan for active or expectant management on admission and a failure to maintain vigilant supervision throughout labour.

Paula has significant disabilities because of events surrounding her birth. She has Cerebral Palsy and a number of disabilities as a result.

Approving the settlement Mr. Justice Garrett Simons said that it was the Corcoran case that the position the baby was lying in before birth should have been given particular attention and there allegedly should have been one to one monitoring and earlier intervention. He said that the defence were denying all claims and contented that the birth was carefully monitored, and proper due care and attention was given to both Mrs. Corcoran and her daughter Paula. The settlement against the HSE was made without admission of liability.

The judge further noted the exceptional care Paula had received from her family throughout the years and said that they had made an excellent contribution and that she was “very, very lucky”.

David O’Malley, Partner at Callan Tansey Solicitors spoke on behalf of the family,  “The family are delighted that the case is finalised. They would like to thank the legal representatives from both sides for utilising mediation to bring a conclusion to a complex case. Justice delayed is still justice.”

The case was reported on by

GalwayBeo.ie

Independent.ie

The Irish Times

RTE News

The Irish Examiner

Enduring Power of Attorney Explained

Enduring Power of Attorney Explained

Everyone knows the importance of making a Will, but have you considered making an Enduring Power of Attorney? Here Christopher Callan, Partner, outlines the advantages of having an Enduring Power of Attorney and the risks that arise if you do not.

What is an Enduring Power of Attorney?

An Enduring Power of Attorney is a document which you sign so that there are designated person(s) whom you have chosen who can handle your legal affairs if at some time in the future you do not have mental capacity. Because of the responsibilities that go with the position of being an attorney, it is better and safer to have two.

 

Why should I make an Enduring Power of Attorney?

To cover the eventuality that you may suffer from a stroke or brain injury which deprives you of your legal capacity. Also, dementia is a very common condition now in Ireland. As we are living longer, the likelihood of suffering from dementia or some form of cognitive impairment increases.

Many people who suffer from dementia still have the requisite legal capacity to manage their legal affairs. However, if the condition is sufficiently serious, it can deprive a person of his or her capacity in this regard. If you have an Enduring Power of Attorney, then you will have chosen the person(s) who can manage your legal affairs when you are not able to do so. If you do not have an Enduring Power of Attorney, the only option is to have you made a Ward of Court.

 

How do you register an Enduring Power of Attorney in Ireland?

The attorneys must obtain a medical report from a doctor (your GP or Consultant Geriatrician). this must confirm that you no longer have legal capacity. They must also serve notices on you, the notice parties whom you will have named in your Enduring Power of Attorney, and the Registrar of the Wards of Court of their intention to apply to register the Enduring Power of Attorney.

The notice parties are at least two people who you previously notified of the fact that you signed an Enduring Power of Attorney. These people would generally be other members of the family. Once this has been done, they must wait for the five week notice period to expire before proceeding with an application to the Wards of Court office (High Court) to have the Enduring Power of Attorney registered. All in all, this takes about two/three months.

 

When should you register an Enduring Power of Attorney?

Your attorneys should register the Enduring Power of Attorney if there are issues or tasks to be dealt with and you don’t have the requisite legal capacity to act, for example, dealing with your bank accounts, tax and financial affairs, leasing or selling property etc.

 

What are the benefits of registering an Enduring Power of Attorney?

Firstly, applying to register an Enduring Power of Attorney is less costly and cumbersome than having someone made a Ward of Court. Secondly, if you have an Enduring Power of Attorney you will have chosen the person(s) whom you want to look after your affairs. If you are made a Ward of Court, it may well be that the person(s) applying to the Court are not the persons whom you would have wished to be those who will act on your behalf.

 

What are the risks of not having an Enduring Power of Attorney?

The risk of not having an Enduring Power of Attorney is that the only other option available is Wardship.

What is the difference between Enduring and Lasting Power of Attorney?

What we call an Enduring Power of Attorney  in this country is described in some other countries as a Lasting Power of Attorney.

Are there changes coming down the line?

Yes – the old system of Wardship is about to be discontinued. A New Decision Support Service will commence in its place. The requirements for Enduring Power of Attorney’s will also change. For example, once you have signed and completed your Enduring Power of Attorney, you will have to register it with the Decision Support Service. Then, if it necessary to activate the Enduring Power of Attorney, your attorneys will have to make an application to the DSS so there will be two sets of registration fees.

If you have questions about any of the issues raised in this article, or about Making a Will, you can contact Christopher Callan by email.

Employment Law Update: Right to Request Remote Working

Employment Law Update: Right to Request Remote Working

Back in February, the Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment Leo Varadkar  referred the General Scheme of the Right to Request Remote Working Bill to the Joint Committee on Enterprise, Trade and Employment for pre-legislative scrutiny.  The fruits...

Read more
Sepsis: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment

Sepsis: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment

The World Health Organisations first Global Report on sepsis found that death from sepsis accounts for 20% of all deaths worldwide. Sepsis kills 11 million people each year. Here Johan Verbruggen outlines the symptoms, causes and treatment of sepsis and how we support...

Read more
What Happens At An Inquest?

What Happens At An Inquest?

An inquest is an official enquiry, held in public and led by a Coroner (sometimes held with a jury)  to enquire into the cause of a sudden, unexplained or violent death.   In the case of some deaths an inquest is legally required. 

Read more
HSE Apologises to parents after death of newborn baby

HSE Apologises to parents after death of newborn baby

Almost five years after the death of newborn baby Danny Ryan, the HSE has apologised to his parents, Brenda and Michael.  An inquest  in June 2019 heard the cause of Danny’s death was severe brain damage due to lack of oxygen.  The case, which was before the Court for...

Read more
Inquest Into Woman’s Death Due To Penicillin Allergy

Inquest Into Woman’s Death Due To Penicillin Allergy

An inquest was held into the death of Mrs. Patricia Bewick at Tralee Circuit Court on July 14th 2022. Mrs. Bewick, from Tarbert, Co. Kerry  was a much loved mother and grandmother who had a penicillin allergy. She died in University Hospital Kerry on the July 17th...

Read more
Medical Negligence Case From 46 Years Ago Settled

Medical Negligence Case From 46 Years Ago Settled

The High Court has approved a settlement of €850,000 against the HSE over the circumstances of the birth, 46 years ago, of a woman with Cerebral Palsy. Paula Corcoran from Sligo was born in Galway Regional Hospital in 1976. It is believed to be the first medical...

Read more
Enduring Power of Attorney Explained

Enduring Power of Attorney Explained

Everyone knows the importance of making a Will, but have you considered making an Enduring Power of Attorney? Here Christopher Callan, Partner, outlines the advantages of having an Enduring Power of Attorney and the risks that arise if you do not. What is an Enduring...

Read more

Cathy and Alan McGrath talk about working with Roger Murray and the medical negligence team of solicitors at Callan Tansey who worked on their case when their son Matthew contracted meningitis when he was 17 years old.

Callan Tansey Pathways to Progress Highlights of the MedicoLegal Conference 2017
“It had never been done before, it’s a groundbreaking event bringing patients, doctors and lawyers together in a room and identifying ‘Pathways to Progress’ “. Roger Murray